ETG General Paper
GP Essay Skills

Building a Body Paragraph, Beyond PEEL

Step 5 of 10

PEEL gets you a competent paragraph and no further. The GP body paragraph that scores runs a fuller cycle: claim, mechanism, layered example, evaluation, link. Here is the container every other move goes inside.

Why PEEL runs out

PEEL, point, evidence, explanation, link, is a fine scaffold for a younger student and a ceiling for an A-Level one. It teaches you to state a point and support it, which is precisely the competent, Band 4 thing that does not climb. It has no slot for the two moves that actually earn marks: explaining the mechanism rather than restating the point, and evaluating the claim rather than only proving it.

The GP body paragraph runs a longer cycle: claim, then mechanism, then a layered example or two, then evaluation inside the paragraph, then a link back to the thesis. Think of the paragraph as a container. Get the container clean and every later move, the concession, the framework, the in-paragraph turn, has somewhere to sit. Build it sloppily and nothing you add later will hold.

Give the mechanism, not the outcome

The single biggest upgrade to a paragraph is the sentence that explains how or why. 'Powerful nations dominate global affairs' is an outcome. 'Powerful nations dominate through the institutions they built after 1945, the Security Council veto, the dollar's role as the reserve currency, the voting weights at the IMF' is a mechanism, and a mechanism turns description into analysis.

The test is to look at your topic sentence and find its main verb. If it says something happens or something is good or bad, you have an outcome. Add the next sentence that says by what route it happens. That sentence is also what makes evaluation possible, because you cannot test a claim whose machinery you have not shown.

Exam tipAfter your claim, write one sentence that starts with 'because' or 'this works by'. If you cannot finish it, you do not yet understand the claim well enough to argue it, and the paragraph will read as assertion until you do.

Examples that show a pattern, not prove a point

One example is an anecdote. The same point made three times is a list. Three examples from different domains showing the same mechanism is a pattern, and a pattern is persuasive in a way a list never is. The aim is not to stack proofs of one claim but to show one logic operating across unlike places.

Use examples for contrast, for exception, for change over time, or for the gap between theory and reality, not for repetition. If you are arguing that controlling information is how authoritarian states hold legitimacy, do not give three countries that censor. Show the same mechanism wearing different clothes: one state managing a rising middle class, another managing a wartime narrative, a third managing street protest. Three contexts, one logic. That is what makes the pattern, not the count.

Link back, and keep the operative term visible

A paragraph that does not return to the thesis leaves the marker to guess what it proved. The link sentence is where you say what this paragraph does to your position: it supports it, narrows it, or holds it under a new condition. Crucially, the link is where you keep the operative term alive. If the question asked 'how far', the link should say how far this paragraph moves the answer.

This is also where the calibration from your thesis pays off. Each paragraph defends or tests one condition you named, and the link reports the result. Do that in every paragraph and the essay reads as a single argument advancing, rather than a set of separate points sitting side by side.

Put it together

Here is the same paragraph built two ways. The PEEL version states and supports a point. The full-cycle version adds the mechanism, lets one example do real work, turns on its own claim, and links back with the operative term intact. It is not much longer. It is the same material, ordered to argue rather than to assert.

Notice that evaluation lives inside this paragraph, not in a separate slot later. That is the subject of the keystone step, and the body paragraph is where you apply it. A clean container plus the in-paragraph turn is most of the distance from Band 4 to Band 5.

PEEL: states and supportsWorking from home is good for employees. For example, many workers in Singapore were able to work remotely and save commuting time. This shows that flexible work benefits employees.
Full cycle: mechanism, evaluation, linkFlexible work benefits employees by returning to them the hours and autonomy that a fixed office removes, which is why Singapore moved in December 2024 to require employers to properly consider formal requests for flexible arrangements. Yet the benefit is not evenly shared. The same arrangement that frees a salaried professional can isolate a junior worker who loses the informal mentoring of the office, and it does nothing for the rider or the cleaner whose job cannot leave the premises at all. Flexible work helps employees most where the job is autonomous and the worker already senior, which is why 'good for employees' has to be a claim about which employees.

Same topic, same length. The weak version supports one point and stops. The strong version shows the mechanism, uses a real 2024 policy, concedes who does not benefit, and links back to the operative phrase. Verified as_of 2026-06: the Tripartite Guidelines on Flexible Work Arrangements took effect 1 December 2024.

FAQ
Is PEEL good enough for A-Level GP?
PEEL will produce a competent, Band 4 paragraph and rarely more. It has no slot for the two moves that lift a paragraph: explaining the mechanism behind a claim rather than restating the claim, and evaluating the claim inside the paragraph rather than only supporting it. At A-Level, build the fuller cycle, claim, mechanism, layered example, evaluation, link, with PEEL as the floor, not the target.
What is the difference between a mechanism and an outcome in an essay?
An outcome is what happens; a mechanism is how or why it happens. 'Social media polarises politics' is an outcome. 'Social media polarises politics because engagement-ranked feeds reward outrage, which surfaces the most extreme version of every view' is a mechanism. Markers reward the mechanism because it turns description into analysis and gives you something specific to evaluate.
How many examples should a GP body paragraph have?
Usually one developed example, sometimes two or three if they show the same mechanism across different domains. Depth beats volume: one example you explain and then test does more than three you only name. If you do use several, make them a pattern, contrast, exception or change over time, rather than three proofs of the same point.
ETG General Paper

Learn this with us

Book a free trial lesson and see how we teach GP from the exam backwards, with marked practice against the band descriptors.

Book a Trial Class   WhatsApp the team