ETG General Paper
2025 A-Level GP · Paper 1 · Question 8

Encouraging a healthy lifestyle

What this question asks

This question asks whether Singapore does enough to help and encourage people to live healthily, or whether more could and should be done.

Question type: To what extent

An ETG General Paper original study guide to the 2025 A-Level GP Paper 1 essay on society & culture. Not affiliated with, or endorsed by, UCLES, Cambridge Assessment or SEAB. A study aid, not an official answer.

Read the question first
Define these terms
  • enough: sufficient against what standard, effort expended, outcomes achieved, or the gap that remains
  • encourage: nudge and enable, as opposed to compel, which marks the limit of the state's chosen role
  • healthy lifestyle: physical, but also mental health, which Singapore's effort addresses unevenly
The hidden assumption

The question assumes 'enough' can be judged by counting policies, when a society can do a great deal to encourage health and still fall short because encouragement is not the same as changed behaviour.

The calibration axis

conditions: Singapore does more than almost any society on physical-health encouragement, but 'enough' depends on the measure, since effort is high, outcomes lag, and mental health and the social drivers of unhealthy living are under-addressed.

Two ways to argue it

How to approach it. Calibrate whether Singapore does enough to encourage healthy living, defining 'enough' and 'encourage' and judging effort against outcomes and against the limits of the state's role.

Option A · Conditions: effort vs outcome vs blind spots

Judged by effort, Singapore does more than almost any society to encourage a healthy lifestyle; judged by outcomes and by what it leaves out, it does not yet do enough, because encouragement has not closed the behaviour gap, mental health lags physical, and the social conditions that drive unhealthy living are barely touched, so the verdict is criterion-dependent.

The argument, point by point
  • By the measure of effort and design, Singapore's encouragement of physical health is exceptional.
    Why A high-capacity state layers prevention, nudges and infrastructure, so a citizen is surrounded by prompts to eat, move and screen better, which is encouragement at a scale few societies attempt.
    Example Healthier SG, launched in July 2023, enrols residents with a regular family doctor for preventive care, while Nutri-Grade labelling and the National Steps Challenge nudge daily choices (MOH; HPB, as_of 2026-06).
    Then evaluate But effort is the wrong measure if it does not change behaviour, and the existence of a policy is not the same as its uptake, which is where 'enough' starts to fray.
  • By the measure of outcomes, the encouragement has not closed the gap between knowing and doing.
    Why Nudges inform choices but do not override the convenience, cost and habit that drive unhealthy living, so behaviour lags the messaging, which means effort can be high while results disappoint.
    Example Despite years of campaigns, diabetes and obesity remain persistent public-health concerns in Singapore, and participation in schemes like the Steps Challenge skews toward the already-motivated (MOH public-health framing, as_of 2026-06).
    Then evaluate The implementation gap is the hinge: enrolling is not complying, and a society can encourage relentlessly and still not do enough if the encouragement does not land where it is needed.
  • By the measure of scope, the effort is lopsided, strong on physical health and far weaker on mental health.
    Why A healthy lifestyle includes the mind, but the stigma, pace and pressure of Singaporean life are addressed far less than diet and exercise, so a whole dimension of health is under-encouraged.
    Example Singapore's intense academic and work culture is a recognised driver of youth and worker stress, yet mental-health support has historically trailed the well-funded physical-health machinery (society pattern, as_of 2026-06).
    Then evaluate So 'enough' fails on scope: a society can do a great deal for the body while leaving the mind, and the conditions that strain it, largely unaddressed.
  • By the measure of root causes, encouragement leaves the social drivers of unhealthy living untouched.
    Why Long hours, high cost of living and a comparison culture shape diet, sleep and stress more than any campaign, so encouraging healthy choices without changing the conditions that crowd them out treats the symptom.
    Example The same kiasu, time-poor culture that fuels Singapore's economic success leaves little room for the rest, exercise and home cooking that healthy-lifestyle campaigns urge (cultural pattern, as_of 2026-06).
    Then evaluate The honest limit: a society serious about health would also address why its people are too stretched to be healthy, which is harder than launching another campaign.
Strongest counter & rebuttal

The state has built the paths, graded the drinks, subsidised the screenings and enrolled people with doctors, so at some point a citizen who ignores all of it is exercising a freedom the word 'encourage' is meant to preserve, and blaming the society for individual choices misreads the question. But this defence works only if the encouragement reaches everyone equally and the conditions allow people to act on it, and neither holds: the schemes reach the motivated, mental health lags, and the social drivers go unaddressed, so 'we have done our part' is true of effort and false of effect.

Measured conclusion

Singapore does more to encourage a healthy lifestyle than almost any society, and on the measure of effort and design the answer is yes; but on outcomes, on mental health and on the social conditions that crowd out healthy living, it does not yet do enough, so I agree only to a limited extent, and the gap is not for want of campaigns but because encouragement reaches the willing and leaves the causes of unhealthy living in place.

What makes this Band 1: Reaches the top band by judging 'enough' against distinct measures, effort, outcome, scope and root causes, by making the implementation gap the hinge, and by using a distinctive feature of Singaporean life as both the success and the limit of its health effort.
Option B · Domain: nudge vs compulsion vs conditions

Whether Singapore does enough depends on which lever you judge, because its approach is deliberately split: it nudges hard, compels selectively, and barely touches the social conditions, so it does more than enough in the nudge domain, exactly as much as it chooses in the compulsion domain, and not nearly enough in the domain that shapes behaviour most.

The argument, point by point
  • In the nudge domain, Singapore arguably does more than enough, layering prompts and information on every choice.
    Why Labelling, campaigns, subsidised screening and gamified activity surround the citizen with reasons to choose well, so the state has saturated the soft-encouragement lever about as far as it can go.
    Example Nutri-Grade grades and restricts advertising of sugary drinks, the National Steps Challenge gamifies walking, and Healthier SG nudges preventive check-ups, a dense web of nudges (MOH; HPB, as_of 2026-06).
    Then evaluate But nudges have a ceiling: they inform the willing and wash over the rest, so doing more than enough in this domain still leaves the hardest behaviour unmoved.
  • In the compulsion domain, Singapore does exactly as much as it chooses to, and shows it will go hard when it decides to.
    Why Where the state judges a risk severe enough, it abandons encouragement for prohibition, so 'enough' here is a policy choice about how far to coerce, not a question of effort.
    Example Singapore has banned e-cigarettes since 2018 and escalated to classifying etomidate, the drug in 'Kpod' vapes, as a Class C controlled drug from September 2025, with heavy penalties (MOH; CNB, as_of 2026-06).
    Then evaluate The complication: the vape ban shows the limit of compulsion too, since prohibition pushed the problem into a black market of drug-laced devices rather than ending it.
  • In the domain of social conditions, which shape behaviour most, Singapore does the least, because the levers conflict with other priorities.
    Why Long working hours, high cost of living and an achievement culture drive unhealthy living, but addressing them would mean trading against the economic model, so the most powerful lever stays largely unpulled.
    Example The same time-poor, high-pressure culture behind Singapore's productivity leaves little room for the sleep, exercise and unhurried meals that healthy living requires (cultural pattern, as_of 2026-06).
    Then evaluate Here the answer is clearly no: the domain that would change behaviour most is the one the society is least willing to touch.
  • Seen across domains, Singapore's effort is intense where it is easy and absent where it is hard, which is the real shape of 'not enough'.
    Why Nudging and selective banning are cheap in political and economic terms, while reshaping work culture and cost of living is not, so the effort tracks ease rather than impact.
    Example The contrast between a saturated nudge environment and a barely-touched culture of overwork captures a state doing the affordable parts of health promotion thoroughly and the costly part hardly at all (society pattern, as_of 2026-06).
    Then evaluate The payoff of the domain view: 'enough' is not one verdict but three, and the society falls shortest exactly where doing enough would cost it most.
Strongest counter & rebuttal

Asking a health ministry to fix work culture and cost of living stretches 'encourage a healthy lifestyle' well beyond nudges and bans, and a society could reasonably say it has done enough within the proper scope of health promotion. But the question asks what the society does, not what one ministry does, and the social conditions are precisely what determine whether the nudges land, so excluding them defines 'enough' down to the easy domains and quietly concedes that the hard one is left undone.

Measured conclusion

Whether enough is done depends entirely on the lever: Singapore does more than enough in the nudge domain and as much as it chooses in the compulsion domain, but not nearly enough in the domain of social conditions that shapes behaviour most, so I agree only within the easy domains, and the society does enough exactly where it costs little and falls short exactly where doing enough would cost it most.

What makes this Band 1: Earns the top band by splitting 'enough' across nudge, compulsion and social-conditions domains, using the current vape and etomidate ban to show both the reach and the limit of compulsion, and locating the real shortfall in the domain the society is least willing to touch.
How the two approaches differ

Option A runs on conditions, judging 'enough' against effort, outcome, scope and root causes to reach a criterion-dependent verdict. Option B runs on domain, splitting the society's effort into nudge, compulsion and social conditions and showing it does enough only where it is easy. Both are defensible: A is the calibrated effort-versus-outcome 'your society' answer; B reframes by lever to reach a sharper 'enough where cheap, not where it counts' verdict.

Common pitfalls
FAQ
How do I judge whether 'enough' is done without just listing Singapore's health policies?
Pick a measure and judge against it. By effort and design, Singapore does more than almost any society, Healthier SG, Nutri-Grade, the Steps Challenge. By outcomes, the behaviour gap persists. By scope, mental health lags physical. By root causes, the social drivers of unhealthy living go untouched. Listing policies counts effort; the marks come from weighing it against results and gaps.
What is a strong, current Singapore example for the healthy-lifestyle question?
The vape ban and its 2025 escalation. Singapore has prohibited e-cigarettes since 2018 and classified etomidate, the drug in 'Kpod' vapes, as a Class C controlled drug from September 2025. It shows the state will move from encouragement to hard compulsion, but also the limit, since prohibition pushed the problem into a black market of drug-laced devices rather than ending it.
Where does Singapore most clearly fall short on encouraging healthy living?
Mental health and the social conditions that drive unhealthy living. The physical-health machinery is dense, but the stigma, overwork and high-pressure culture that strain mental health and crowd out rest, exercise and home cooking are addressed far less, because tackling them would trade against the economic model. That is where 'enough' fails.
ETG General Paper

Want your essays marked like this?

These outlines are free to read. Book a trial lesson to have your own GP essays marked against the band descriptors, the way ETG teaches General Paper from the exam backwards.

Book a Trial Class   WhatsApp the team