This question asks whether religion still serves a purpose in a modern, scientific and increasingly secular world, or whether it has been left behind.
Question type: Yes/no question
An ETG General Paper original study guide to the 2022 A-Level GP Paper 1 essay on society & culture. Not affiliated with, or endorsed by, UCLES, Cambridge Assessment or SEAB. A study aid, not an official answer.
The question assumes modernity and religion pull against each other, smuggling in the secularisation thesis that as societies modernise, religion fades, when the global picture is more religion in some domains and less in others.
domain: religion's role has shrunk as an explainer of nature and a source of law in many societies, but persists or grows as a source of meaning, identity and community, so the answer differs by function.
How to approach it. Judge whether religion retains a function today, defining 'role' and 'modern world' and resisting both the secularisation story and a flat reassertion of faith.
Religion's role as an explanation of the physical world and a basis for public law has genuinely receded in modern, secular societies, but its role as a source of meaning, moral community and identity persists and in places grows, so it has not lost its role but changed which role it plays.
Across Western Europe and increasingly East Asia, belief, attendance and religious authority over public morality have fallen sharply, and the rising share reporting no religion suggests a genuine, generational drift away from faith that no amount of reframing erases. But secularisation is uneven and incomplete even where it is strongest, religion is growing globally in absolute numbers, and the decline of institutional religion in some domains coexists with its persistence in meaning and its resurgence in politics, so the honest reading is redistribution of religion's roles, not their disappearance.
Religion still has a role in the modern world, but not the role the question imagines defending: its grip as an explanation of nature and an unquestioned basis for law has loosened in secular societies, while its function as a source of meaning, community and contested political identity endures and in places strengthens, so modernity has not ended religion's role but reshaped which roles it plays.
The question assumes a clean line between a religious past and a secular modern world, but that line is an illusion: modern societies have not replaced religion so much as relocated its functions into secular forms, so religion's role has not ended, it has gone partly unnamed.
If political loyalty, wellness culture and national ritual all count as religion, then the term explains nothing, and the genuine, measurable decline of belief in God and the authority of religious institutions deserves to be taken at face value rather than reinterpreted away. But the point is not that these substitutes are religions, it is that they occupy the same functional slot, so the decline of belief is real while the role religion played is not vacant, which is exactly what the question, framed as a simple yes or no about religion's survival, is built to obscure.
Religion still has a role in the modern world because the modern world never abolished the needs religion met, only some of the institutions that met them: meaning, belonging and moral framing have been relocated into secular substitutes, often political ones, so the honest answer is not whether religion has a role but which form of that enduring role a plural society should prefer.
Option A accepts the secularisation frame and splits 'role' by domain, finding religion diminished as explanation and law but persistent as meaning and identity. Option B rejects the frame, arguing modernity relocated religion's functions into secular substitutes rather than ending them. Both are defensible: A is the calibrated domain answer a marker expects; B is the premise-rejecting move that reads as more conceptual if the functional-substitute claim is held without overreaching.

These outlines are free to read. Book a trial lesson to have your own GP essays marked against the band descriptors, the way ETG teaches General Paper from the exam backwards.